in the error that you have not built themselves.
I like about one or another place recommended here have StoxEv ..
I grade myself on a working tool which deals with ICM and SNGs, I found an error in the calculation of the programmers of StoxEv is also known. (He just does nothing against it because easier to program)
any case, this can lead to completely wrong rank, and I've played maybe a while after this the wrong order.
What probably cost me a lot of money .. never trust ..
At least what push / fold situations with low stacks in ICM concerns situations.
StoxEv rounds simply a stack 7.5 to 7 off!
So the value of gain for a Fold button and small blind in the stack scenario
7/7/7 is calculated:
value from the hand icm (7/7/7) should
value after the hand-icm (7/6.5 / 7.5) are
is:
Icm (7/6/7)! which naturally produces an enormous increase of the evs, because suddenly a whole lacks blind! change
This, of course, completely hands to push the more profitable to fold as. And he charged
otherwise accessible from the icm situations in the box blinds and rounds it!
hernehmen No more for it ...
Poker:
currently purely nothing, no wsop, not online.
Bin fully with the completion of my thesis (the aforementioned program icm) deals that I have done in 2 months need.
PS
StoxEv is still a great tool, the rounding takes place only in situations icm.
ppg
sauviele There are small mistakes that can be made in many more situations are rare, etc., I will not do here StoxEv bad .. the real lesson is simply no tool to trust blindly. (On the other side .. what choice you have .. ne test except themselves)
as I've just corrected a mistake where I probability for the a push / call / fold hergenommen scenario did take the call over the normal range call range.
is barely noticeable in the result and I would not know where to behold because I have just compared with StoxEv etc. .. I would probably not have noticed.
